Vintage Tastings

By John Kapon

Experience the finest and rarest wines in the world through the eyes and palate of Acker Chairman and globally renowned master taster, John Kapon (our “JK”). “Vintage Tastings” is a written journal chronicling the incredible bottles opened at some of the most exclusive tastings, wine dinners, and events all over the globe. These entries represent JK’s commitment to capturing and sharing the ephemeral nature and ultimate privilege of tasting the world’s rarest wines. Although ratings are based on a 100-point scale, JK believes there is no such thing as a 100-point wine. Point scores assigned to each wine are his own personal attempt to quantify the quality of each experience.

The Happiest of Holiday Parties

Happy New Year Everyone! May 2014 be your best year yet. Life can often be measured in extremes; good and evil, love and hate, black and white, make that red and white. And on one special night before Christmas, a group of New York’s finest wine lovers got together in the nest of its finest new restaurant, Charlie Bird, with a lineup of extraordinary wines, made all the more extraordinary by the people who brought them. This was a special group of friends and wine lovers that go way, way back, a group that has collectively accounted for many great memories. It was only fitting to spend one Christmas night with all of them, living and loving.

Yummy Bird Food

That’s what I have tried to do, live wine and love wine, and Champagne is always a good place to start. And so we began with a spectacular 1947 Krug Collection magnum. There were only four possible people in the world that would have brought this out of magnum, and Wolfgang was still in Europe. Three of the others were at this dinner, but Big Boy will get the credit. What an incredible magnum this was, possessing a great nose full of creamy vanilla fruit and sex. The King of Champagne (one of Big Boy’s many aliases) was already finding ‘tertiary’ aromas. This was a rich, long, round and delicious magnum, with just enough fizz to make it more interesting than the most interesting man in the world. I mean, obviously the guy would drink fine wine, right? The bar had been set high, early (98M).

A trio of Bollygood started with an affected 1949 Bollinger. There was an immediate note of paint thinner, never a great sign. However, the palate had great texture, still rich with nice spritz. It was long and could have been an incredible wine, but it was an affected bottle (94A).

The 1961 Bollinger was solid as a rock. Someone noted ‘shellfish and minerality,’ comparing it to a great Chablis. It was classy and long with nice citrus flavors, ‘wine of the flight’ per BB (96).

Bond. James Bond.

The 1966 Bollinger came close to the ’61. It was rich and full with more orange flavors, but it didn’t quite have the length or acid of the ’66. It was still outstanding (95).

We segued to the reds with a couple of white magnums, thanks to Big Mike and The Punisher, in that order. These two whites made me wish more people brought white wines to events, it’s ok . Especially when the whites are like a magnum of 1949 Haut Brion Blanc…f*ck me very much, talk about rare. This was a combination of bloody rare and crime scene bloody. ‘Christmas tree’ came from the crowd. Sir Robert Bohr found it ‘waxy with lanolin.’ There was this cray cray glue-like complexity to the nose, and a ‘wow how you like me now?’ oomph to the palate. It was full of honey flavors, in a perfect spot. It was like this insane mix of potpourri and a Rocky Mountain high. Lady Agah noted, ‘little Japanese white mushrooms,’ you know, those emoji lol. It was still so sweet and so great, Big Boy contributed ‘apricots’ while another ‘white pineapple’ (97M).

The Punisher was actually a surprise guest. He was invited, but his way of confirming was ‘what time?’ I now know better. He was accordingly and mercifully left off the email chain before dinner; I am sure Big Mike would have gladly traded places. Thankfully, The Punisher always has at least two bottles and two magnums on him, one of which was the 1986 Domaine Leflaive Batard Montrachet, in magnum. It had typical 1986 to it, with sweet corn and honey oozing from its nose, make that candy corn. Its palate was rich and sweet with more honey. It had a mature finish; this wine was on a plateau, but it wasn’t going anywhere anytime soon, at least out of magnum (95M).

He Went Thataway

The Red Burgundies on this night were not so starry, beginning with an oxidized 1952 Vogue Musigny Vieilles Vignes. I could see how a good bottle would be great, but this wasn’t one of them (DQ).

A 1952 DRC Richebourg was a better showing for this secretly fabulous vintage for red Burgundy. The Riche had lots of red rover fruit and fresh garden aromas. It was round, lush and creamy with a softer finish yet long acid. It got better in the glass and was fuller than the 1940 La Tache that would follow. The ’52 DRC got ‘The Empty Glass Toast’ from La Machina, formerly known as The Cardinal, but we’ll get to that a bit later. (94).

The 1943 DRC Richebourg was oxidized, ‘awkward but powerful’ (DQ).

Now for that 1940 DRC La Tache, the last bottle of red Burgundy on this night. It was an unusually short and sweet appearance for the Pinots; the original theme of ‘1940s’ probably had something to do with it. This rare 1940 had an elegant nose, but it clearly didn’t have the weight of a great vintage. There was a hint of VA here as well, but its palate was balanced and elegant with flavors of rose and red fruits. It was a lovely wine (91).

DRC Doozies

It was on to our featured attraction of Bordeaux with a 1928 Cos d’Estournel thanks to The Rev. It was a bottle that was reconditioned in 1988. La Machina noted ‘catcher’s mitt.’ That’s pronounced the Spanish way, La Maqueena or Makeena, I can’t remember exactly, but some of you may remember him as The Cardinal, and those of you that really know him, including everyone at this dinner, remember him as King Angry. He gave up the throne for religion, but he never could quite fully repent, and now he is half-man, half-machine, possibly the first cyborg of his kind. Back to the Cos, which had a nice, deep nose that was very nutty and buttery. There were aromas of cocoa butter, cedar, carob and sweet fruit. The palate had some heavy cream qualities and was tasty and smooth with a hint of citrus (93).

A Kiss of Cos

The 1928 Haut Brion that followed was a bit controversial, good at first revealing signature coffee and espresso in the nose, but turning quickly sour on the palate to the point of (DQ).

A 1945 Latour reaffirmed the fact that 1945 is likely the greatest vintage of all-time. This was a spectacular bottle with a rich, sweet nose full of cassis, black fruit and walnut. It kept getting richer, deeper and blacker. There was amazing ‘fruit concentration’ per one, along with delicious chocolate flavors. Big Mike found it ‘very rich,’ while La Machina noted ‘a touch of gym socks.’ Gentleman Jim found it more like ‘panties.’ It was about that time (98).

The 1945 Lafite Rothschild was outstanding in its own right, a Shylock selection. It was another great nose, full of cedar, chocolate, cassis and other classic aromas. Its palate was elegant, long and fine, but there was still meat on dem bones. It was really tasty and classy, but no match for the Latour (95).

The Greatest of All Time?

It was coming Noah’s Ark style, two by two, and next up was a 1948 La Mission Haut Brion. It got a ‘great’ from La Machina, possessing excellent aromas of wheat, white smoke, carob and light toasted nuts. This was a rich wine, as good as the vintage gets in the Left Bank. That’s a La Mission characteristic, to exceed expectations in tougher or tricky years. Gentleman Jim noted ‘hazelnuts’ and also found it ‘rich and tasty’ (95).

Riding Dirty

The 1948 Latour was simple and easy by comparison, round and soft with tender black fruits. Easy, soft and simple reappeared in my notes (90).

Time was flying by, and it was already 1949, a 1949 Mouton Rothschild, to be precise. This was another great nose, thick with coffee grinds and a pinch of green bean. This bottle was courtesy of Bad Boy, aka Bruce The Returner. Since he was only the third owner since release, he wasn’t returning this one . This was rich and fleshy with nice grit in the mouth. There were tobacco flavors, wet, brown and green ones all rolled in one. This was right on the border of outstanding, so I rounded up (95).

Mouton Madness

Our first Right Banker was a solid 1952 Cheval Blanc. It had a great nose, full of rich spice and decidedly different. It felt heavy in a loading up for winter way, dark red in hue. Its palate was softer and easier, round with some vim. There was still some oily, meaty and gamey goodness in this tasty wine (94).

It was another winning showing for La Miss with the paired 1952 La Mission Haut Brion. Its nose was great, with lots of asphalt melting out of it. This was another rich and tasty wine that was big and black with its midnight fruit. There was hot summer sweat here, even though it was the heart of December (95).

We were almost finished with the Bordeaux, but we had to have a couple ’61s to close. 1928-1961 is a pretty good lesson when it comes to Bordeaux, and the 1961 Haut Brion was up for the final chapter. Its nose was full of slate and meaty fruit, along with tobacco, forest and mint. Its palate was also minty, and it had some good horsey to it. This was a bottle reconditioned in 1980 or 1982, I couldn’t quite read it. This was a long, smooth and satiny wine (96).

The 1961 Mouton Rothschild was up for the ’61 Challenge. It also had a minty nose, but in a different way than the HB. The Mouton felt richer and was more minty, showing flashes of ’47 and ’74 Heitz on top (96).

A 1971 Petrus from an OWC finished our Bordeaux in fine fashion, it had a similar gamey and coconutty nose to a recent 1970, although the ’70 outweighs the ’71. The ’71 was still rich and long, an outstanding wine as well (95).

OWC Me

Big Mike dropped the hammer with a near-perfect bottle of 1961 Jaboulet Hermitage La Chapelle. This was a sick wine, with a nose more intense than anything prior. This was a city unto itself, so intricate and so complex with so many nooks and crannies. There were great roasted menthol flavors here, and hearty alcohol to match. This was a beautiful monster, as good as it gets (99).

A magnum of 1978 Jaboulet Hermitage La Chapelle was the right idea, but unfortunately slightly corked. It was rich and solid overall, but masked. Meat, asphalt and acid stood out (95A-M).

Out With a Bang Zoom

Everyone started to stumble out one by one, but those of us that were left were treated to a perfect bottle of 1979 Salon thanks to Bad Boy. That’s what we call ‘and one’ (97).

It was the happiest of holiday parties. 2014 was starting to feel pretty good.

In Vino Veritas,
JK

The Holiday BYO

Every year, we here at Acker have a fun, holiday tradition – a BYO party at The Tribeca Grill where over 100 people get together and share bottles from their cellars. It is an evening that underscores the essence of wine itself – sharing and love. It is also an evening that can get a bit out of control, as there can be a dizzying amount of wines in the room, not only moving around at any given table, but also moving around the room with their owners. It is always an amazing, random mix of so many great wines, a kinetic winergy rarely equaled.

Last year, somehow the schedule got messed up, and I could not attend. I was determined not to miss it two years in a row, and I flew back from Hong Kong just to make it in time to step off a plane, sleep for four hours, and wake up for dinner. It was worth the effort. Perhaps the jet lag got the best of me, as my record # of tasting notes for this event was 52 this year I had only 26, but what a 26 they were.

It began innocently enough with a 2008 Sauzet Chevalier Montrachet. 2008 White Burgs can be ripe and rich, and this had some yeasty, sweet fruit and a round finish. I wanted a little more out of this wine, which felt a little simple by the usual Sauzet and Chevalier standards (92).

I couldn’t ask for anything more from the 2000 Coche-Dury Meursault Perrieres. What a wine. This was fabulous from first sniff, full and quite rich for 2000. It had signature white fruits and that Coche kink, and it still felt young and ascending. This was a monumental expression of Chardonnay (96).

That was it for the whites yes, it is still a red, red world, although I am a big consumer of white wines personally. We began with Bordeaux a debate would ensue the next night about Bordeaux before Burgundy or Burgundy before Bordeaux, but on this night we went South to North. A 1949 Lafite Rothschild was a little weedy and musty but classic underneath. It was a gentle giant with classic pencil aromas and tender tea flavors. This was a wine enjoying its retirement, although affected by the cork (93A).

A shot of 1990 Vogue Musigny Vieilles Vignes quickly interrupted the Bordeaux courtesy of the Rapmaster, and this was better than usual. This has been a controversial wine for a while now, often coming across stewed, gamey and/or milky, but sometimes not. This was a solid wine, displaying some richness and robust qualities along with roasted red fruits. It was still a bit square and rugged, but I didn’t mind the flavor profile of this particular bottle. Perhaps this wine will always be a tale of two bottles (92).

We were back to our regular programming with a not-so-regular 1985 Lafleur. This was all about its blackness in a fruit and olive way. It was a dark and brooding wine, showing the other side of Lafleur. Lafleurs can be super sweet and kinky, or dark and brooding, almost in Jekyll and Hyde fashion depending on the vintage. This still had some classic kink without being overly sweet, although it did get a touch sweeter in the nose. The Copperhead found it ‘a touch dry,’ without trying to be negative (94).

The 1989 DRC Romanee St. Vivant kept sticking their noses in my palate. Its nose was awful, not cooked, not corked, just flawed. It was like sour milk city. The palate was better at first, showing some typical 1989 qualities, so I recommended that it sit for a bit and work itself out. Unfortunately, when we came back to it about an hour later, it was completely sour. It was a perplexing wine, and I was unsure if it was the bottle or the wine (NR?).

We were back to Bordeaux with a 1943 Latour, the second time I have had this ancient, rare wine this year. Thankfully, Jason had/has a (now partial) case J. Its nose was deep, chunky and chocolaty, showing unexpected strength from an unheralded vintage. Its flavors were wheaty and a touch porty, but it still had some up front freshness to its hint of game. Deep and dark, this was a classic Latour, although my previous notes revealed the last bottle was a bit better. At this age, it all comes down to the bottle, even when from the same case (91).

A 1982 Margaux was classic all the way. It had really nice fruit with fifty shades of black and purple. While there was deep fruit, there was delicate spice and that typical Margaux seductiveness. Its palate was round and lush with nice tannins. This is still grace in a glass (95+).

The 1970 Petrus remains one of my favorite wines from this important Chateau. Why? Well, it’s a great vintage and it’s about the same price as the ‘lesser’ young vintages. The smart money that drinks will stick with the ’70, or other oldies of the sorts. The Petrus had rich fruit and a coconutty kink. This was meaty and chewy accordingly, a rich brew courtesy of some Pomerol witchcraft. Lush and complete, the ’70 sang like a baritone and stung like a bee (96).

A Holiday Flight

Hamburger snuck in some 1998 Chave Hermitage, and I was glad he did. This was a saucy and delicious red, a vintage that is completely undervalued in the market for Chave, and about and sexy and seductive as a ‘young’ Chave can be (95).

We switched gears with a pair of Italians thanks to David et Fils, beginning with a 1967 Giacomo Conterno Barolo Monfortino Riserva. While its nose wasn’t so great at first, it had delicious tea flavors. As David Senior noted, ‘it’s not perfect but it works.’ Carob and caramel rounded out its dusty palate. Many old Barolos get tea-like, especially depending on the vintage (93).

The 1990 Gaja Barbaresco Costa Russi delivered toffee and coffee with lots of leather and tar behind it and on its long finish. This was a rich and classic Gaja (94).

A swallow of 2008 Raveneau Chablis Vaillons was easy and pleasing, but the second ’08 white that under-delivered on this night (90).

A magnum of 1970 Latour proved to be tasty. This was pretty by the usual Latour standards, open and soft with some red cherry buttressed by walnut. This will always be an excellent, but never a great, Latour (93M).

We finally made it to the red Burgundies it was a lot of work to get here, but we were primed and ready. The Copperhead signed, sealed and delivered with a 1990 Rousseau Chambertin. This was a ‘wow’ wine, possessing green bean goodness in its nose along with some wet bamboo. There were delicious and rich red fruit flavors that had that green, stalky goodness. The bamboo stayed and had no zled. This was a long, elegant yet substantial wine. Someone mentioned ‘Catherine Deneuve’ (97).

I brought a 1990 Ponsot Clos de la Roche Vieilles Vignes. Why would I bring the 1990 Ponsot? Well, it happened to be the best bottle of Burgundy hanging out in the store, and I had just stepped off a 16-hour flight it was an easy decision. Unfortunately, it was slightly corked. If you could get past its corked qualities, there was a rich, beefy and saucy wine that was one of the most concentrated of the night. There were menthol and meat flavors, but this was definitely corked to the point where it was tough to continue. Someone mentioned ‘Brigitte Bardot.’ If I had to guestimate, I would put this wine in the (96A) category. It would definitely be outstanding were it not corked.

1990 Greatness

The 1993 Roumier Bonnes Mares that followed had a great, reserved nose that was long and smooth. This was really good but reticent, black and dark. It was shut down, and we didn’t have enough time to get to know it on this night, but it had me thinking about it long after I left (95+).

A 1991 Dominus interjected. I love Dominus there are few California Cabs that I enjoy as much, and a recent 2006 had me licking my lips and someone else’s. But I didn’t love this 1991. It was green, round and soft. I just didn’t feel it (91).

I felt the 1993 Vogue Musigny Vieilles Vignes, however. It had the tight, ’93 edge but again was a bit soft and reserved, a la the Roumier. Was it a phase? Was it this night? Was it that 1990 outshined 1993 for a change? Not sure, but I definitely have had better bottles, or rather bottles that have shown better (93+).

Mason Perry’s 1995 DRC La Tache entered on cue, or on clue. It had clean and lean fruit and a delicate nose. This was a fresh and smooth 1995 that was light, elegant and beautiful and far from the rusty nails that many wines from this vintage can be (94).

The 1993 Roumier Chambolle Musigny Amoureuses let me know that 1993s weren’t all shut down at the moment. This had a fantastic nose that was rich and much more complicated than either of the previous ’93s. This had juice that was loose, and it ‘KO’d the Bonne Mares,’ as one guest put it. Although it was clearly better on this night, I wasn’t 100% certain it was the better wine. This was rich, open and dare I say ready. For a 1993 red Burg, that’s almost an insult lol (97).

Seeing Double

Right turn, Rhone, with an excellent 1995 Rostaing Cote Rotie Cote Blonde. This was all about the classic pepper and violet with almost white fruit. It was tasty, balanced and long I was impressed (94).

The Rostaing outpaced the 1998 Guigal Cote Rotie La Mouline that followed. The La Mouline was richer, more oaky and more concentrated but somehow delivered less (93).

A 1970 Palmer was completely (DQ),corked, I believe.

I probably took a swallow of another 6-8 wines, but I stopped writing after two of them, an excellent, hearty and solid 1990 Faiveley Chambertin Clos de Beze (94) and a sweet, buttery and corny 2001 Ramonet Batard Montrachet (93).

That’s all folks!

The Ugly Aftermath

In Vino Veritas,
JK

The Mogul Strikes Back

It’s tough to find a good bottle of Bordeaux in New York City…an open one, at least. Well, there just happens to be a few good Americans left that still love their Bordeaux…old and mature, of course. Thanks to The Mogul, who is probably atop the Bordeaux drinking charts in the USA, many of New York’s wine cognoscenti were reminded of just how good a great old Bordeaux can be, or visa versa.

I think there were about ten of us, so Lady Agah brought a double magnum of 1961 Lafite Rothschild. Niiiiice. And so was this bottle, which was about as good as this wine ever gets. There was honeyed fruit and nice supporting carob and cedar aromas. There was a delicate spice to its sweet, enticing nose. A big debate ensued about the overall quality of the wine; there was no question this was in ‘excellent’ territory, 93-94 points for those of you keeping score. Dapper Dave admired its ‘velvety animal texture.’ It was soft, easy and creamy, just beautiful. Every refresher invigorated the wine again. I was kind of torn between 93 and 94 points, vacillating back and forth. Bottles will likely score lower, but I could still go back to it at the end of the night after all the great wine that ensued…and still enjoy. Drink up, as not all bottles are created like double magnums, and this isn’t one of the legendary wines from this legendary vintage (93D).

A Good Beginning

Who says China gets all the Lafite? Not The Mogul, who pulled out a 1959 Lafite Rothschild next. What a great bottle, this was clearly deeper and darker than the 1961. There was much more forest and cedar to this black Knight and night of a wine. Gentleman Jim noted ‘cinnamon, allspice and clove.’ Its flavors showed carob again, but this time with layers of caramel on top. This was a rich and saucy wine with nice concentrate to it in a grape seed and oil kind of way. There were solid desert flavors on its dry finish. This ‘screamed’ Lafite to Big Boy (97).

The next flight began with a 1959 La Mission Haut Brion. This was chocolate city in the nose, along with coffee, mocha and rye toast. Smokehouse, cedar and gravel rounded out its nose in classic fashion, but the palate was a bit askew. ‘Stewy’ came from The Inspector, and ‘VA’ from Big Boy, who continued to coo about the ‘so clean’ ’59 Lafite. This was a dirty birdie for sure, but there is a place for clean, and a place for dirty. The palate was definitely a touch stewy, but also chewy. Cereal came out with time, and it got better, but I have had better (94A).

Twin ’59 Billers

Gentleman Jim noted ‘huge mint’ in a spectacular bottle of 1961 Haut Brion. A lot of ‘here here’s followed. The group couldn’t decide whether it was Peppermint Patty or Junior Mints, though. Forest and creamy fruit oozed out of its meaty nose. The palate was chocolaty and tasty, making me sneeze twice with its impressive expression. This was pure deliciousness. It was so exotically minty, it almost made me feel kinky. Long appropriately summed up its finish, and this was ultimately a WOTN (98).

A new bar was set, and the 1961 Latour kept pace. There was similar 1961 goodness here. Again, ripeness was on full display, but in a more purple and walnutty Latour way. There was also a touch of mint here, or maybe that was the Haut Brion still lingering! The Latour was not nearly as open as the HB, yet obviously heavy duty. There were thick thighs in its nose, and its palate was rich and long, ‘still the one,’ I wrote. Its palate was a quartet of so’s – so young, so fresh, so perfect and so long, but this was a wine that I didn’t want to see later, I wanted it right there, right then. Thick came to mind again. At first, I preferred the Latour, but the HB kept challenging and challenging, and many preferred the Graves in the end. It was a dead heat, but Latour is still on the way up (98+).

Twin ’61 Killers

We changed gears with a 1959 Ausone, which The Inspector didn’t like. It was a bit of a cherry bomb with some good medicine to it. There was some yeast to its chocolate, and nice wintergreen flavors on its lean and clean palate. Someone wasn’t in the clean camp, noting ‘chicken shit.’ I saw what he was saying, but nonetheless, it was rich, hearty and solid (93).

Tom Terrific brought a superb bottle of 1959 Petrus. I don’t think I have had or ever will have better. Its nose was super exotic like a coconut cake mixed with dried plums and a hint of fig. This was a perfect bottle, creaming in the glass and finding a balance between its bigness and great acidity. It kept getting better and better, but it was tough to defer the pleasure. This was a wine that would make one think about the consequences later (97).

Right Bank Booty

A 1961 Trotanoy was up for the challenge. This was another saucy and sexy Pomerol. It had a big nose and showed more classic components like wafer, chocolate and plum. This was sweet on the outside and the inside. It possessed more of an oily texture and was another long, great wine. 1961 Pomerols are about as good as it gets (97).

The 1959 Latour a Pomerol was another great ’59 Pomerol. Chocolate, chocolate and more chocolate emerged. One could ‘see the heat of the vintage,’ someone remarked. This may have not been as complex as some of the previous wines, but it was still fantastic. Similar descriptors such as long and creamy reappeared in my notes. Enjoyable was a good way to sum it up (95).

Oh Yes We Did

There was one more wine on this starry night, a 1961 Lafleur from an original wood case with great provenance. Ok now. Gentleman Jim found it ‘Burgundian,’ and Big Boy hailed it as ‘superior wine.’ ‘Perfect Pomerol’ and ‘wine of the night from the nose’ came from the crowd. This bottle was incredibly youthful, much less developed than the couple of others that I have been fortunate to try. Its fresh purple cascaded into a creamy pool of honeyed deliciousness. ‘Nuff said (96+).

Money Shot

True to form, The Mogul got up and excused himself from his own dinner, leaving us all in blissful shock and awe. He had another date after dinner. Actually, he had two.

In Vino Veritas,
JK

A Busy Week

I don’t really keep up with all the wines I drink. Not sure if that is a problem, I kind of look at it as a pleasure. Writing gives me joy, but sometimes joy is best kept behind closed doors lol. Not sure if I am getting wiser, but I am definitely getting older, but as long as there is wine on my dinner table, it’s all good.

So September saw me taking two trips to Asia in the same week. I am the worst travel agent, by the way. By the time I came back and gave birth to October’s HK sale, Fall was in full swing. Everyone was back in New York, and my first official week back had me seeing a few familiar faces such as The Don, The Rev, The Inspector and The Queen. Yes, if you don’t have a ‘The’ in front of your name, then you aren’t the one lol. I have a new one on the way, by the way, my fourth and final chapter. Thinking about naming him Kareem Abdul Kapon, has a nice ring to it.

I am not sure of the particular order of the wines sampled, but if anyone wants to wager, I will pay 100 to 1 if you can identify who brought which wine in this article. I am included, of course. 2005 Chateau de Beaucastel Roussanne Vieilles Vignes is a good place to start. This was kinky and big, like a well-placed high heel, rich and concentrated with that unique white Rhone flavor. Glue, inner yellow peel and stinky cheese rounded out this monstrous white (95).

Another kinky white Rhone was a 2006 Guigal Condrieu La Doriane. White Rhone has to be one of the more interesting and underappreciated categories in fine wine today. This was another full, big and rich ‘wow’ white. I loved its gamy intensity and drugged honey flavor (94+).

Awesome Atera

The 2007 Lafon Meursault Perrieres was smooth and direct like NFL Sundays. It had clean fruit, white with a touch of yellow along diamonds and minerals. There was nice flex to its muscle in this cut and fit white (94).

A stellar bottle of 1986 Leflaive Bienvenues Batard Montrachet made one of my nights. It had just the right amount of sweetness, not over top like many siblings from the vintage, ‘deelish’ came to mind. This was an impressive and lingering ’86, still young and still tight, just how I like it (95).

The last white of the week was a 2004 Dauvissat Chablis Les Clos. I am a huge fan of this wine in general. This particular bottle was a bit bready, but still easy to drink if you seek character and complexity as opposed to obviousness. That’s the essence of Chablis (92).

The 1993 Rousseau Chambertin Clos de Beze was a special treat with its aromas of forest, cedar and tree-like fruit. It was served a touch cold but made me feel warm and fuzzy anyway. Flavors of black, burnt rubber made me hot like revved up motors. This was life in the fast lane (96+).

Righteous Rousseau

The 1990 Rousseau Chambertin Clos de Beze was even better, this was a great ’90, immune to the ‘disease’ of the vintage, as the Burghound likes to call it. There was flesh to its fruit, meat to its bones, and flavors of tea, leather, game and sauce. Forest was also there, like Gretel without Hansel. There are dueling banjos and dueling Rousseas, on any given Sunday either of these two great vintages can come out on top (98).

There were two more 1993 Burgs sampled this week, beginning with a shut down 1993 Rouget Vosne Romanee Cros Parantoux. I wanted so much more out of this wine, but only got shy purple and aren’t you not experienced fruit. There was latent potential here but it just didn’t click on this night (91).

Put A Cork In It

The other ’93 was an impressive A. & F. Gros Richebourg. This was a big wine, powerful and rich, showing more fruit than your average 1993. There was percolating menthol to its black and purple personality, and a lot of spice to this behemoth. It got stronger with time (95).

Speaking of Gros, one of the best wines I had this busy week was a 1962 Gros-Renaudot Clos Vougeot. This was an incredible ’62, both delicious and lingering. It felt like it needed a sequel, I wanted more. Its fruit was so lush and creamy, it hit my wine spot and reminded me how age equals beauty when it comes to great wine (96).

Cros, Gros & Beze

A 1999 Roumier Bonnes Mares was another ballgame, delivering a game-winning hit. This was still young, hinting at its wealth, but it kept its wallet in its pocket. There were cascades of red, purple and black fruit but none on obvious display. It had flesh without being fleshy, and flavor without being fruity. Earth and cedar sprinted up and down its sidelines, trying to get in the game. I loved the wine, but it still felt way too soon (95).

We began with the Rhone, so let’s end with it. A 1995 Chateau Rayas Chateauneuf du Pape was a bit shut down, simpler than I expected, not the usual extrovert. It didn’t get better over a long evening, either. Hopefully this was just any given bottle or any given phase, it just wasn’t any giving wine on this night (92).

It was a busy week, indeed, although no Bordeaux, but The Mogul would take care of that rather quickly and in the finest of fashions…

In Vino Veritas,
JK

×

Cart

I AM OF LEGAL AGE

Sign up for Acker exclusive offers, access to amazing wine events & world-class wine content!



    Please note there will be a credit card usage fee of two percent (2%) on the total auction purchase price up to the credit card payment limit of USD$15,000, HKD$150,000, or SGD$20,000 for live auctions, and on the total amount charged on internet auctions (except where prohibited by applicable law).